米、ＷＨＯから脱退へ トランプ氏が大統領令署名

【ワシントンＡＦＰ＝時事】ドナルド・トランプ米大統領は２０日、世界保健機関（ＷＨＯ）からの脱退に向け、大統領令に署名した。トランプ氏はこれまで、新型コロナウイルス感染症（ＣＯＶＩＤ－１９）への対応をめぐり、ＷＨＯ批判を繰り返してきた。（写真はスイス・ジュネーブの世界保健機関〈ＷＨＯ〉本部に掲げられたロゴ）
　トランプ氏は就任式に臨んだ後、ホワイトハウスで演説し、米国は中国に比べてはるかに多額の資金をＷＨＯに拠出していると主張。「わが国はＷＨＯにだまし取られている」と語った。
　米国はＷＨＯへの最大の拠出国。米国が脱退すれば、ＷＨＯは大規模な再編を余儀なくされ、世界的な健康関連プロジェクトが混乱に陥る恐れがある。
　第１次トランプ政権も、新型コロナのパンデミック（世界的な大流行）初期の段階でＷＨＯは中国の影響を受けすぎたとして脱退を表明。ただし、ジョー・バイデン政権下で脱退表明は撤回された経緯がある。【翻訳編集ＡＦＰＢＢＮｅｗｓ】
〔ＡＦＰ＝時事〕（2025/01/21-19:01）

President Donald Trump on Monday signed an executive order directing the United States to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO), a body he has repeatedly criticized over its handling of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Speaking at the White House hours after his inauguration, Trump said the United States was paying far more to the UN body compared to China, adding: World Health ripped us off.
The United States, the largest donor to the Geneva-based organization, provides substantial financial support that is vital to the WHO's operations.
Its withdrawal is expected to trigger a significant restructuring of the institution and could further disrupt global health initiatives.
This marks the second time Trump has sought to sever ties with the WHO.
During his first term, the United States issued a notice of intent to withdraw, accusing the organization of being overly influenced by China during the pandemic's early stages.
That move was later reversed under former president Joe Biden's administration.
- China promises support -
In Beijing, China's foreign ministry spokesman said Beijing would continue supporting the WHO.
The role of the WHO should only be strengthened, not weakened, Guo Jiakun said.
China will, as always, support the WHO in fulfilling its responsibilities... and work towards building a shared community of health for humanity.
In his new executive order, Trump directed agencies to pause the future transfer of any United States Government funds, support, or resources to the WHO and to identify credible and transparent United States and international partners to assume necessary activities previously undertaken by the WHO.
The administration also announced plans to review and rescind Biden's 2024 US Global Health Security Strategy, which was designed to prevent, detect, and respond to infectious disease threats, as soon as practicable.
Several experts expressed dismay at the withdrawal.
We cannot make WHO more effective by walking away from it, Tom Frieden, a former senior health official under Barack Obama, wrote on on X.
The decision to withdraw weakens America's influence, increases the risk of a deadly pandemic, and makes all of us less safe.
Others warned that by withdrawing from the organization, the United States will lose privileged access to important epidemic surveillance data which could harm the capacity to monitor and prevent health threats from abroad.
Instead of being the first to receive vaccines, we will be at the back of the line, wrote Lawrence Gostin, professor of public health law at Georgetown University, on X.
Withdrawal from WHO inflicts a deep wound on US security & our competitive edge in innovation.
The timing of the US withdrawal comes amid mounting fears over the pandemic potential of the current bird flu outbreak (H5N1), which has infected dozens and claimed one life in the United States.
Meanwhile, WHO member states have been negotiating the world's first treaty on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response since late 2021 -- negotiations now set to proceed without US participation.